CanonLaw.info

 

Canon Law
   Books
   Articles & Reviews
   Speaking & Media
   Canonistics
   Other
Liturgy
   Documentation
Catholic Issues:
   Articles & Reviews
   Ecclesiastical Latin
   Scriptural Greek
   Other
Personal
   Special Needs
   Fine Films
   Dessert Wines
   In Memoriam
   Links
Notices/Vendors
E-Mail Webmaster

 

This website is best

viewed 1152 x 864

Edward Peters

Canon Law Articles & Reviews


Click here to purchase this book online

 

 

Michael Smith Foster

Annulment: The Wedding that Was: How the Church Can Declare a Marriage Null (1999)

Review by Dr. Edward N. Peters

Foster, adjutant judicial vicar for the Archdiocese of Boston, has written a straightforward, reliable overview of the Church's annulment process. Intended as background or preparatory reading for those involved in or impacted by the annulment process, Foster's book happily avoids coming across as a how-to manual whose tips are to be applied in pursuing an annulment regardless of the justice, or lack of justice, of the underlying case. Indeed, roughly half of the book actually presents, at least in juridic terms, the main elements of church teaching on marriage itself, thus making Foster's explanations of the marriage annulment process all the more understandable. My reservations on this book are few.

Foster faces the same problem all experts face when writing for non-specialists, namely, what level of misunderstanding to accept in his readers in order to address more important issues. This is a prudential call, and I merely observe that at certain points my decision would have been different. For example, in commenting on the impediment of ligamen, I would not have let stand the assertion that the impediment exists "if the prior marriage was valid, that is, [if] it has not been declared invalid by Church authority" (16). Again, no permanent deacons are "exceptions" to the law of celibacy (21). Or again, F.'s frequent use of the term "good and natural marriage" to describe marriage between non-baptized parties is going to strike some readers as redundant, or as sug­gesting to others that "good" means something different from "natural" in marriage, but what?

None of these presentation problems are serious, of course, and all can be readily cleared up by short consultations. Some of Foster's tightest writing, on the other hand, is found in his chapter "Dispelling Misconceptions." Here, Foster ably levels one annulment myth after another. Indeed, readers skeptical of the process as a whole might be well advised to read this short chapter first. +++

This review first appeared in Theological Studies


Top || Home || Canon Law || Liturgy & Sacraments || Catholic Issues || Personal