+
I dislike cinemas,
and barely manage a couple visits per decade. Virtually nothing about
them makes sense anymore. They are relics of a different time.
enp.
+
Gertrud (1964): Should have been titled
"Danish Zombies in Love". Utterly unsympathetic and
self-centered main character, surrounded by uninteresting people
(some of them cads), all portrayed most boringly (unless maybe one
needs to see what dissociative fugue states look like). Yeah, yeah, I know,
Gertrud is supposed to be high art. Well, if the stuff
hanging in the modern wings of many museums is "art", then so is this film.
+
The most devastating movie review I ever read, one that
demolished forever the myth of Gandhi as being anything
like a great film, was Richard Grenier's essay "The Gandhi
Nobody Knows" that ran in Commentary, March 1983, pp.
59-71. |
|
Personal
Fine Films
Essential
Genres
Comedy
/ Satire
1.
It's a Mad...Mad World,
'63 2.
Some Like It Hot,
'59 3.
The Odd Couple,
'68 4.
Dr. Strangelove, '64 5.
Sleeper,
'73
6. Scoop, '87 7.
The Goodbye Girl,
'77 8.
Young Frankenstein,
'74 9.
Love and Death,
'75 10.
Monty Python, Holy Grail, '75
11. The Producers, '68 12.
Ghostbusters,
'84 13.
Shot in the Dark,
'64 14.
Singing in the Rain,
'52 15.
Operation Petticoat,
'59
16. Father Goose, '64
17. The Thin Man, '34
18. Return of the Pink Panther, '75
19. Barefoot in the Park, '67
20. Ferris Bueller's Day Off, '86 |
American Drama
coming |
Silent
Classics
under development
Passion of Joan of Arc (1927)
The General (1926)
Napoleon (1927)
Steamboat Bill, Jr. (1928)
Battleship Ptomekin (1925) |
William
Shakespeare
/ Edward De Vere
Branaugh:
HAMLET
(1996), HENRY V
(1989)
MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING (1993)
Holm: KING LEAR (1998) Dietrle: MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM (1935)
Welles:
MACBETH
(1948),
OTHELLO
(1952)
Olivier: HAMLET
(1948),
KING LEAR
(1984),
MERCHANT OF VENICE
(1973),
RICHARD III
(1955) Zeffirelli:
HAMLET
(1990),
ROMEO AND JULIET
(1968)
TAMING OF THE SHREW
(1967)
Mankiewicz:
JULIUS CAESAR
(1953)
Kurosawa: THRONE OF BLOOD
[MACBETH] (1961),
RAN
[KING LEAR] (1985),
|
The Harpo Marx Honor Roll
The whole point
of "talkies", of course, is to admit dialogue into stories. I rejoice
for it. Still, every once in a while, it behooves us to recall that not
all acting requires speaking, and that from time to time, in large roles
or small, some fine acting is offered without a word being spoken. May I
suggest the following: |
Deafness
and Life
1.The Miracle Worker
(1962)
2.
Love Is Never Silent (1985)
3.Children of a Lesser God
(1986)
4.The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter
(1968)
5.Johnny Belinda
(1948)
6.Mr. Holland's Opus
(1995)
7. Reasonable Doubts (1991-1993)
Avoid: Looking for Mr Goodbar
(1977). A few scenes in SEE, even with the great Lou Fant, do not
salvage this navel-gazing, soft-porn, slasher wanna-be waste of time. |
4-F
(Famous
Films with Fatal Flaws)
1.
Battle of the Bulge (1965)
2.
Saving Private Ryan (1998)
3.
I Confess (1953)
4.
Ghandi (1982) |
Musicals
1. Fiddler on the Roof (1971)
2. Sound of Music (1965)
3. How to Succeed in Business
(1967)
4. The Wizard of Oz (1939)
5. Oklahoma (1955)
6. Evita (1996)
7. The Music Man (1961)
8. Carmen Jones (1964)
Avoid: The
Unsinkable Molly Brown (1964, because it's so stupid), Seven Brides for
Seven Brothers (1954, because it's so boring), Paint Your Wagon
(1969, because it's so horrible), My Fair Lady (because it's so
rotten), and Singin' in the Rain
(1952, because it is NOT a musical; watch it as a great comedy.) |
Good Films to Avoid
on
Mothers'
Day
Now Voyager (1942)
White Heat (1949)
Psycho (1960)
Manchurian Candidate (1962)
I, Claudius,
nos. 1-7 (1976)
Interiors (1978)
|
Films to Avoid
on
Fathers'
Day
Virtually all Disney Movies
(except 101 Dalmatians
&
Finding Nemo)
|
Good Films to Avoid
on
Fourth of
July
Primary Colors (1998) |
Good Films to Avoid
on
Wedding
Anniversaries
The Lion in
Winter (1968)
Who's
Afraid of V. Woolf? (1968)
I, Claudius (1976)
|
|
|
Shockingly Good
Films coming
Some films are, in
one sense, quite terrible, but still contain more than a few kernels of truth. Such
films--and they are few--teach (perhaps unintentionally) real moral values, though usually via negativa.
They border on trash (and in the hands of the immature, are surely as dangerous
as old dynamite in daddy's garage) but they respect standards of acting,
directing, dialogue, and so on, rendering them legitimate exercises in cinema.
They are not for everyone, and one can lead a happy life without ever having
seen them. But for those who have seen them, and have been quietly surprised
that they sensed in them something more than is commonly recognized (whether pro
or con), stand by: this list is for you.
Essential
Actors || Essential Actresses || Essential
Directors
Top
|| Home
|| Canon
Law || Liturgy
& Sacraments || Catholic
Issues ||
Personal
|