CanonLaw.info

Dr. Edward Peters

To work for the proper implementation of canon law is to play an extraordinarily

constructive role in continuing the redemptive mission of Christ. Pope John Paul II

Please support

CanonLaw.info

Blog

Facebook

Webmaster

Notices

 

4 dec 2018

Masterpage

1983 Code

Masterpage

1917 Code

Masterpage

 Liber Extra

 Masterpage

 Eastern Code

Research links

 

Codex Vigens 1983

Codex Vigens 1990

 

Pan-Textuals 1983

Pan-Textuals 1917

 

Academic Works

Related

Overview

 

 

Advisory Opinions and Published Consultations in Canon Law

 

Advisory opinions and published consultations, a canonical literary form similar to the "casus conscientiae" of the moral theologians, are a staple of canon law. These short works, usually responding to a narrow set of facts (sometimes hypothetical, but often actual, if disguised), illustrate the concrete application of law to life. All advisory opinions are unofficial (no matter who wrote them) and boast only the authority of the arguments made therein. Nevertheless, advisory opinions and published consultations form an important part of canonical literature and contribute to the evolution of canonical jurisprudence.

 


1983 Code

1990 Code

The most important collection of advisory opinions on Johanno-Pauline law is that published annually by the Canon Law Society of America, here.

 

1917 Code

Among the most important collections of advisory opinions on Pio-Benedictine law are:

 

  William Conway (Irish priest, 1913-1977), Problems in Canon Law: Classified Replies to Practical Questions (Newman, 1956) 345 pp. ▪ Review: E. Roelker, Jurist 17 (1957) 211. Notes: Earlier versions of most replies can be found be in The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, 1943-1956. ≡ Conway biograph.

 

  Edward Mahoney (English priest, 1888-1954), Priests’ Problems, ed. by L. McReavey, (Burns & Oates, 1958) 468 pp. Review: F. Furlong, Gregorianum 42 (1961) 161. Notes: Not every question and/or answer was strictly canonical, but an index on pp. 459-461 indicates whether a given canon was among the more than 230 canons treated in some 335 main questions. Earlier versions of most of Mahoney's replies can be found be in Clergy Review, 1945-1954.

 

  aa.vv., Consultationes Iuris Canonici, (Pont. Inst. Utriusque Iuris, 1934/1939) in 2 vols. ▪ Summary: Scores of questions on hundreds of canons from throughout the Pio-Benedictine Code.

 


User notes

Reviews and Notes are grey-highlighted, on-line biographical information is underlined blue-linked, and matters in green highlights are of special interest. Yellow highlights are cautions for users, while the markers "=", "≠", and "≈" are placeholders for use by webmaster.

Staging

 


 Materials on this website represent the opinions of Dr. Edward Peters and are offered in accord with Canon 212 § 3.

This website undergoes continual refinement and development. No warranty of completeness or correctness is made.

Dr. Peters' views are not necessarily shared by others in the field nor are they intended as canonical or civil advice.

 

CanonLaw.info Homepage & Site Directory / Help support CanonLaw.info / Original Materials © Edward N. Peters